| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence |
| Date: | 2022-07-22 19:42:48 |
| Message-ID: | 738154.1658518968@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> writes:
> I wanted to test one of the patches we have for the July CF on the
> Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+. It runs Raspbian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) and
> Linux Kernel 5.10.60-v7+.
> I discovered that the PostgreSQL tests don't pass in this environment.
Since you haven't explained what's different about this environment,
it's hard to comment on these results. But is this really a stock
Postgres source tree, with no local modifications? The fragment of
src/test/regress/expected/copy.out that you show does not look
current.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-07-22 19:58:28 | Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-22 19:26:47 | Re: warn if GUC set to an invalid shared library |