Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes
Date: 2022-11-08 03:37:59
Message-ID: 7344373b30cd07a97cc490b29ed4f93fc90da43c.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 23:04 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-11-05 at 10:08 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Agreed; new compilation patch attached, including mine and then
> > Robert's suggested rewordings.
>
> Thanks.  There is clearly a lot of usefule information in this.
>
> Some comments: [...]

I thought some more about the patch, and I don't like the title
"Transaction Management" for the new chapter. I'd expect some more
from a chapter titled "Internals" / "Transaction Management".

In reality, the new chapter is about transaction IDs. So perhaps the
name should reflect that, so that it does not mislead the reader.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2022-11-08 03:41:07 Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2022-11-08 03:10:03 Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block