Re: Why facebook used mysql ?

Not true.

As a condition of getting European Commission's approval of its acquisition of Sun/MySQL, Oracle had to agree to continue the GPL release.

And there are non-Oracle upgrades from Google, facebook, Percona, etc. So no one is beholden to Oracle.

--- On Tue, 11/9/10, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Why facebook used mysql ?
> To: "Andy" <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>
> Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "DaveGauthier" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>
> Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 12:31 PM
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Andy
> <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Any upgrades that are based on the MySQL source code
> will be legally required to be released under GPL too.
> >
> > That's the beauty of GPL.
>
> Upgrades released by Oracle *do not* have be under GPL.
> They own all
> the IP, and can release future versions under whatever
> terms they see
> fit.
>
> Other entities, do have to use the GPL if they release
> their own updates.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>