| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Setting visibility map in VACUUM's second phase |
| Date: | 2012-12-06 18:57:39 |
| Message-ID: | 7343.1354820259@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> One other thought: I'm wondering if we shouldn't try to push the work
> of setting the all-visible bit into heap_page_prune().
Hm, maybe ...
> But it seems to me that a page can't be all-visible unless there are
> no dead line pointers and no HOT chains of length != 1, and
> heap_prune_chain() does manage to call HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() for
> every tuple, so the raw information seems like it is available without
> any additional CLOG lookups.
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum is interested in whether a dead tuple is dead
to everybody, but I don't think it figures out whether a live tuple is
live to everybody. On the assumption that most tuples are live, adding
the latter calculation might represent significant expense.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-06 18:59:32 | Re: How to check whether the row was modified by this transaction before? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-12-06 18:57:36 | Re: Fix for pg_upgrade status display |