From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martin Coxall <coxall(at)cream(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: location of the configuration files |
Date: | 2003-02-14 15:35:41 |
Message-ID: | 7335.1045236941@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martin Coxall <coxall(at)cream(dot)org> writes:
> Partially true. The FHS specifies that the /etc top layer is for system-own3d
> stuff, but the subdirectories off it are explicitly used for user space programs
> and, well, everything. (/etc/apache, /etc/postgres, /etc/tomcat3,
> /etc/tomcat4...)
FHS or no FHS, I would think that the preferred arrangement would be to
keep Postgres' config files in a postgres-owned subdirectory, not
directly in /etc. That way you need not be root to edit them. (My idea
of an editor, Emacs, always wants to write a backup file, so I dislike
having to edit files that live in directories I can't write.)
Here's a pretty topic for a flamewar: should it be /etc/postgres/ or
/etc/postgresql/ ?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-02-14 15:38:27 | Re: location of the configuration files |
Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2003-02-14 15:32:05 | Re: Incremental backup |