Parallel Query

From: Luís Roberto Weck <luisroberto(at)siscobra(dot)com(dot)br>
To: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Parallel Query
Date: 2019-11-13 20:16:44
Message-ID: 732b7303-8b60-2f33-7f00-3b0cd70a7c5b@siscobra.com.br
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi!

Is there a reason query 3 can't use parallel workers? Using q1 and q2
they seem very similar but can use up to 4 workers to run faster:

q1: https://pastebin.com/ufkbSmfB
q2: https://pastebin.com/Yt32zRNX
q3: https://pastebin.com/dqh7yKPb

The sort node on q3 takes almost 12 seconds, making the query run on 68 
if I had set enough work_mem to make it all in memory.

Running version 10.10.

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2019-11-13 20:40:17 Re: Parallel Query
Previous Message Marco Colli 2019-11-13 16:15:43 Re: Slow "not in array" operation