Re: improving GROUP BY estimation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improving GROUP BY estimation
Date: 2016-03-31 20:40:53
Message-ID: 7329.1459456853@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another minor gripe is the use of a random URL as justification. This
>> code will still be around when that URL exists nowhere but the Wayback
>> Machine. Can't we find a more formal citation to use?

> The article text refers to this 1977 S. B. Yao paper "Approximating
> block accesses in database organizations" which doesn't appear to be
> available online, except behind ACM's paywall at
> http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=359475

Well, a CACM citation is perfectly fine by my lights (especially one
that's that far back and therefore certainly patent-free ...)

Let's use something like this:

See "Approximating block accesses in database organizations", S. B. Yao,
Communications of the ACM, Volume 20 Issue 4, April 1977 Pages 260-261

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2016-03-31 20:43:58 Re: improving GROUP BY estimation
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-03-31 20:39:26 Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?