Re: Trouble managing planner for timestamptz columns

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc Morin" <marc(at)sandvine(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trouble managing planner for timestamptz columns
Date: 2006-03-10 18:31:13
Message-ID: 7329.1142015473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Marc Morin" <marc(at)sandvine(dot)com> writes:
> We tend to analyze these tables every day or so and this doesn't always
> prove to be sufficient....

Seems to me you just stated your problem. Instead of having the planner
make wild extrapolations, why not set up a cron job to analyze these
tables more often? Or use autovacuum which will do it for you.

> Since the table is so large and the system is busy (disk not idle at
> all), doing an analyze on this table in the production system can take
> 1/2 hour! (statistics collector set to 100).

I'd believe that for vacuum analyze, but analyze alone should be cheap.
Have you perhaps got some weird datatypes in the table? Maybe you
should back off the stats target a bit?

We do support analyzing selected columns, so you might try something
like a cron job analyzing only the timestamp column, with a suitably low
stats target for that column. This would yield numbers far more
reliable than any extrapolation the planner could do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-10 18:58:50 Re: one-field index vs. multi-field index planner
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-03-10 18:25:57 Re: Hanging queries on dual CPU windows