Re: nested transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: nested transactions
Date: 2004-05-15 16:07:35
Message-ID: 7329.1084637255@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 17:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Turns out the patch is too big and the server won't publish it.

> Is there a good reason for keeping this size limit on the -patches list?

I think Marc was more or less forced into lowering the size limit to
keep the lists from being flooded with viruses.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-05-15 21:43:22 Re: error codes for ln(), power()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-15 15:52:36 Re: error codes for ln(), power()