| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter_e <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS |
| Date: | 2010-01-21 14:54:47 |
| Message-ID: | 7316.1264085687@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 21:07, Kevin Grittner
>> Reality check: does the frequency of lost CVS commits within git
>> seem consistent with this theory?
> Well, supposedly all our servers are synced with NTP. I know the main
> cvs server is, and the git server is, but it goes past the anoncvs
> server which is a hub.org server so I don't know for sure there - but
> I think it is? So I don't think it's the machines-out-of-sync issue.
> Or at least the window for that is *really* small.
I have noticed that CVS operations (at least from the user's viewpoint)
work in local time. So even if the clocks are synced, a different TZ
setting could conceivably lead to issues.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-21 15:00:36 | Re: quoting psql varible as identifier |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-01-21 14:51:57 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |