Re: Side effect of synchronous_commit = off

From: Arthur Turrini <atgnbk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yan Cheng CHEOK <yccheok(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Side effect of synchronous_commit = off
Date: 2010-03-29 18:46:24
Message-ID: 7308d4541003291146x25be13c1jc9098f3820e90614@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Being asynchronous, means that write-to-disk will be queued in kernel for
later execution, ie, postgresql won't wait for its write confirmation, but
they will occurr in a serial manner.

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Yan Cheng CHEOK <yccheok(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

> I was wondering whether setting synchronous_commit = off will have the
> following side effect.
>
> (1) Process A issues UPDATE command on row x, from false to true.
> (2) After that, Process B READ from row x.
>
> Is it possible that when Process B start to read row x, the "true" value is
> not being "flushed" to the table. Hence, process B will read the row x as
> false?
>
> If this situation will happen, is it possible that Process B may issues a
> command, use to "flush all" pending data to be written to disk?
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Yan Cheng CHEOK
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message paulo matadr 2010-03-29 20:20:36 COPY ERROR
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-03-29 18:41:50 Re: playr (or similar tool)?