From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
Date: | 2010-08-14 13:23:33 |
Message-ID: | 7305.1281792213@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No doubt, but the TODO entry you removed is still 100% accurately
>> worded, and what's more the archive entry it links to clearly describes
>> exactly the point at issue, namely that grouping by a PK *isn't*
>> indeterminate. You were wrong to remove it.
> OK, I put it back, but I still feel we might not need it anymore.
Even if you're willing to believe that the questions will stop once
we have this feature, that won't happen for more than a year.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-14 13:37:21 | pgsql: MyBackendId now needs to be PGDLLIMPORT, so that contrib modules |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 13:02:22 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-14 13:30:49 | Re: BUG #5608: array_agg() consumes too much memory |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-14 13:21:42 | Re: WIP partial replication patch |