| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine |
| Date: | 2022-10-01 20:58:28 |
| Message-ID: | 72f2bcf5-e173-e1d0-5606-2a43d2d3c9ca@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/1/22 3:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm still of the opinion that we need to revert this code for now.
[RMT hat, but speaking just for me] reading through Tom's analysis, this
seems to be the safest path forward. I have a few questions to better
understand:
1. How invasive would the revert be?
2. Are the other user-visible items that would be impacted?
3. Is there an option of disabling the feature by default viable?
Thanks,
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-10-01 22:15:14 | Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-10-01 20:38:21 | Re: interrupted tap tests leave postgres instances around |