Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Date: 2009-07-03 20:00:06
Message-ID: 727.1246651206@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think it IS newest at the bottom, and I agree that that is how it
>> should be.

> It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up
> with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random.

Yeah, I think that's what I'm seeing.

> What
> are the chances that the date or timestamp of the corresponding wiki
> modification could be put onto the patch and comment lines? (One
> would hope that could be done with a script, rather than by hand....)

Currently, it seems that most or all of the entries are links to
archived messages. Scraping the date from the underlying message
would be the best thing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-03 20:09:13 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-03 19:48:54 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-03 20:09:13 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-03 19:48:54 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org