| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Readd use of TAP subtests |
| Date: | 2021-12-08 13:53:59 |
| Message-ID: | 726c3a72-b6b2-ae0f-7d69-86bd2a5f5a2a@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/8/21 08:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Now that subtests in TAP are supported again, I want to correct the
> great historical injustice of 7912f9b7dc9e2d3f6cd81892ef6aa797578e9f06
> and put those subtests back.
>
> Much more work like this is possible, of course. I just wanted to get
> this out of the way since the code was already written and I've had
> this on my list for, uh, 7 years.
+many as long as we cover all the cases in Cluster.pm and Utils.pm. I
suspect they have acquired some new multi-test subs in the intervening 7
years :-)
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-12-08 13:56:01 | Re: enable certain TAP tests for MSVC builds |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-12-08 13:53:33 | Re: Readd use of TAP subtests |