Re: libpq protocol version 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq protocol version 2
Date: 2007-06-25 22:24:21
Message-ID: 7267.1182810261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
> Is protocol version 2 still used by anything? Is there a reason why
> this is still supported?

Even if you're not concerned about breaking old clients, I believe that
the JDBC folk are still giving out advice to use ProtocolVersion=2 as
a workaround for various arcane portability issues for Java clients.

In any case, AFAICS there's no very good reason to remove it. The
amount of backend code involved is pretty trivial.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2007-06-25 23:11:26 Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-25 22:14:08 Re: Waiting for archive to complete