From: | Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: partitioning using dblink |
Date: | 2008-02-29 17:19:27 |
Message-ID: | 726329.26654.qm@web28113.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Exactly, because inheritance/constraint exclusion wont work with views.
Ok, so there should be something written in the docs about it...
From:
"the information about a view in the PostgreSQL
system catalogs is exactly the same as it is for a table. So for the
parser, there is absolutely no difference between a table and a view"
I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any errors, it's only that data in the view doesn't show up when I query the master table.
> > 2) Why am I supposed to use unions in the view?
>
> So that query evaluator can exclude unnecessary partitions.
Ok: that would be another way of having partitions, right?
> > 3) I know that I am doing select * from tbl in the remote db; that is
> something I can work on later.
> > At least I would like to see it working, since there is nothing in the docs
> that says it shouldn't be working...
> > 4) I am not able to rewrite my queries.
>
> Have fun then.
Yeah I know...
Thank you
___________________________________
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail:
http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Clodoaldo | 2008-02-29 17:23:32 | Re: Insert vs Update syntax |
Previous Message | Brent Friedman | 2008-02-29 17:13:58 | Re: Insert vs Update syntax |