Re: SLOOOOOOOW

From: Ian Harding <harding(dot)ian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jürgen Rose <anykey(at)gmx(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SLOOOOOOOW
Date: 2005-09-06 21:51:42
Message-ID: 7256023005090614513530f51a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/6/05, Jürgen Rose <anykey(at)gmx(dot)de> wrote:

> I did some serious stuff with SQLServer and Interbase, and I had
> **never** those performance problems.
>

On a laptop? Under VMWare?

I have used MSSQL Server too, and find PostgreSQL to compare favorably
in most cases. You may have found a case where it does not. I have
found PostgreSQL to work fine out of the box in most cases, with the
main 'obscure knob' that needs to be twiddled being sort_mem (or
work_mem for 8.0 and up.)

If you give specifics of your database structure and migration
functions I am sure someone on the list will be able to help you get
reasonable performance.

> enough of ranting, but I'm totally frustrated

It will work out.

- Ian

> with best regards
> Jürgen
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

  • SLOOOOOOOW at 2005-09-06 21:09:43 from Jürgen Rose

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-09-06 22:01:41 Re: Shared disk storage
Previous Message Kevin Barnard 2005-09-06 21:37:56 Help with row locks on 7.4 to 8.0 migration