Re: POSS. FEATURE REQ: "Dynamic" Views

From: Ian Harding <harding(dot)ian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: POSS. FEATURE REQ: "Dynamic" Views
Date: 2005-08-28 05:12:51
Message-ID: 7256023005082722123b337fa9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

My first idea when this was mentioned was more like

ALTER TABLE .... CASCADE

where CASCADE meant recompile all the views that depend on that table.

Not that I think any of this is a good idea, but if it was going to be
done, that's what would make the most sense to me.

- Ian

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tang Tim Hei 2005-08-28 08:22:11 Re: ： Re: A strange problem
Previous Message Chris Browne 2005-08-28 03:35:52 Re: Postgresql replication