From: | Ian Harding <harding(dot)ian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guy Rouillier <guyr(at)masergy(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostGreSQL -> SQL server |
Date: | 2005-05-10 13:52:25 |
Message-ID: | 7256023005051006522f966cd1@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
MS SQL Server has what used to be called "Linked Servers" which could
use ODBC to connect directly to other data sources. Your tool talking
to MS SQL Server would need to use fully qualified table names,
including the name of the "Linked Server" but it might work.
On 5/9/05, Guy Rouillier <guyr(at)masergy(dot)com> wrote:
> Jonathan Lam wrote:
> > HI all,
> >
> > I am new to PostGreSQL and I need some help. We received a database
> > in PostGreSQL from another group within the company, and we are
> > planning to use ERWIN to Forward/Engineer it into a SQL Server
> > because one of our tool can only use SQL Server.
>
> Have you investigated updating the tool so it can talk directly to
> PostgreSQL? Might end up being less work (and more robust) than
> migrating all the data from PG to SQL Server each time the other group
> sends you the database.
>
> --
> Guy Rouillier
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-10 13:53:18 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Steve Manes | 2005-05-10 13:31:41 | Re: Data Modelling Tools |