| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: location of the configuration files |
| Date: | 2003-02-14 15:27:23 |
| Message-ID: | 7254.1045236443@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 12:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> If you want ps to display the data dir, you should use -D. Remember, it
>> is mostly important for multiple postmaster, so if you are doing that,
>> just use -D, but don't prevent single-postmaster folks from using
>> PGDATA.
> Could not the ps line be rewritten to show this, as the backend's ps
> lines are rewritten?
I for one would rather it didn't do that. I already set my postmaster
command lines the way I want 'em, and I don't want the code overriding
that. (I prefer to use explicit -p arguments to distinguish the various
postmasters I have running --- shorter and easier to read than explicit
-D would be. At least for me.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-14 15:30:07 | Re: location of the configuration files |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-14 15:20:56 | Re: location of the configuration files |