Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Date: 2020-07-29 23:51:36
Message-ID: 722d83e1-6c1c-5f49-c8bb-0917079c4037@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/07/29 3:30, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> út 28. 7. 2020 v 20:25 odesílatel Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>> napsal:
>
> Thanks for the info. I am waiting for review. Is there any summary of requested changes needed?
>
>
> Maybe it is just noise - you wrote so you will resend a patch to different thread
>
>>
>>> I tried to reattach the thread there. I'll prepare a new patch soon, what should I do? Just attach it again?

Yeah, since I read this message, I was thinking that new patch will be
posted. But, Josef, if the situation was changed, could you correct me?
Anyway the patch seems not to be applied cleanly, so at least it needs to
be updated to address that.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-07-30 00:32:55 Re: HyperLogLog.c and pg_leftmost_one_pos32()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-07-29 23:46:08 Re: Missing CFI in hlCover()?