Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download
Date: 2016-04-26 07:04:04
Message-ID: 7229AB57-81C5-4C12-94D1-3471BB53F8ED@pgadmin.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> On 25 Apr 2016, at 20:05, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> -WWW,
>
> In reviewing:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKq0gv+Gc0i8j=ktQSkMkLJmmTqUHAm=Eza7zLv+MdXCB6H+Bw@mail.gmail.com
>
> It becomes clear that they are following the Open Source way in a more transparent fashion that the other universal packages available.

In what way exactly? I can't even find the source code on the website. The existing installers are on git.postgresql.org.

The other thing to be very careful of is confusing users. Are these distributions interchangeable? What happens if a user tries to upgrade one with the other?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Mead 2016-04-26 13:04:33 Wiki editor persmissions?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-04-26 01:05:29 Re: persianpug list