Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Also, wolfSSL is developed by a company and dual GPL/commerical
> licenses, so it seems like a mismatch to me.
Yeah, that's definitely a factor behind my disinterest in
making wolfSSL be the only alternative. However, as long as
it's available on GPL terms, I don't see a problem with it
being one alternative.
regards, tom lane