Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?
Date: 2023-07-04 07:45:02
Message-ID: 72156562-2057-4487-8506-71704757F969@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 20 Mar 2023, at 16:48, Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/20/23 15:58, Gregory Stark (as CFM) wrote:

>> Should we move it to next release at this
>> point? Even if you get time to work on it this commitfest do you think
>> it's likely to be committable in the next few weeks?
>
> It is very unlikely. Maybe it's better to remove it from CF and put it back later if the test case I will provide does a better job at convincing the Postgres folks that RI checks should be parallelized.

As there is no new patch submitted I will go ahead and do that, please feel
free to resubmit when there is renewed interest in working on this.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-04 07:48:23 Re: suppressing useless wakeups in logical/worker.c
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-04 07:40:34 Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15