| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COPYable logs status |
| Date: | 2007-06-08 20:42:31 |
| Message-ID: | 7209.1181335351@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> How about creating a log-writing-process? Postmaster could write to the
> log files directly until the log-writer is up and running, then all
> processes can send their log output through the log-writer.
We *have* a log-writing process. The problem is in getting the data to it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-06-08 20:47:08 | Re: COPYable logs status |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-06-08 20:29:09 | Patch review process; Warning to patch submitters |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-06-08 20:47:08 | Re: COPYable logs status |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-08 20:10:08 | Re: Minor changes to Recovery related code |