Re: Call for port reports

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-31 05:01:53
Message-ID: 7201.1067576513@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> One other idea would be to set CFLAGS to "" before including template,
> and just test to see if it is still "" after --- that might be cleaner
> than saving the original value and comparing.

Yeah, that bothered me a bit too --- what if the template tries to set
CFLAGS to its already-existing value? I was thinking that unsetting
CFLAGS before running the template would be the best answer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-10-31 05:16:40 Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Previous Message Jordan Henderson 2003-10-31 05:00:59 Re: O_DIRECT in freebsd