From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PQHost() undefined behavior if connecting string contains both host and hostaddr types |
Date: | 2018-03-09 21:42:30 |
Message-ID: | 71a5b770-f3ce-8273-77f5-8e9ad4a63e31@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/13/18 22:19, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> While working on [1], we find out the inconsistency in PQHost() behavior
> if the connecting string that is passed to connect to the server contains
> multiple hosts with both host and hostaddr types. For example,
>
> host=host1,host2 hostaddr=127.0.0.1,127.0.0.1 port=5434,5432
>
> As the hostaddr is given preference when both host and hostaddr is
> specified, so the connection type for both addresses of the above
> conninfo is CHT_HOST_ADDRESS. So the PQhost() returns the
> conn->pghost value i.e "host1,host2" instead of the actual host that
> is connected.
>
> Instead of checking the connection type while returning the host
> details, it should check whether the host is NULL or not? with this
> change it returns the expected value for all the connection types.
I agree that something is wrong here.
It seems, however, that PGhost() has always been broken for hostaddr
use. In 9.6 (before the multiple-hosts stuff was introduced), when
connecting to "hostaddr=127.0.0.1", PGhost() returns "/tmp". Urgh.
I think we should decide what PGhost() is supposed to mean when hostaddr
is in use, and then make a fix for that consistently across all versions.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2018-03-09 22:18:22 | Re: csv format for psql |
Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2018-03-09 21:35:33 | Re: [PATCH] Verify Checksums during Basebackups |