> On 8 Jul 2021, at 07:01, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 12:49:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Since we're already past beta2, I'm not sure that's a good idea. We
>> can't really treat pageinspect 1.9 as something that the world has
>> never seen.
>
> Yeah, that's why I would object to new changes in 1.9 and
> REL_14_STABLE. So my take would be to just have 1.10, and do those
> changes on HEAD.
+1, this should go into a 1.10 version.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/