Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?

From: "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com>
To: "Tony and Bryn Reina" <reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "Bradley Kieser" <brad(at)kieser(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?
Date: 2004-04-02 19:04:37
Message-ID: 71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A25683280105784B@loki.wc.globexplorer.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin


Informix fees vary but figure about $33,000 per CPU for a web environment (other licenses are cheaper, for instance, a server with only a handful of connections). On the plus side for Informix, the Oracle stuff we had consists of dozens of tapes and CDs ... Informix was rarely more a CD and much easier to get going.

Greg Williamson
DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony and Bryn Reina [mailto:reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com]
Sent: Fri 4/2/2004 6:28 AM
To: Bradley Kieser
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?
> Oracle's main drawbacks are:
> a) VERY resource-intensive with a high process startup overhead.
> b) VERY expensive. You are talking license fees into the £100 000s for
> big iron installations.
>

Wow! 100,000 pounds for software. Now that is expensive! Is that a ballpark
price for most of the commercial DB stuff out there? It would be interesting
to see just how expensive (cost of licensing-wise) commercial DBs really are
from a side-by-side matchup.

-Tony

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Naomi Walker 2004-04-02 19:32:51 Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?
Previous Message Goulet, Dick 2004-04-02 18:43:33 Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?