From: | "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tony and Bryn Reina" <reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "Bradley Kieser" <brad(at)kieser(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
Date: | 2004-04-02 19:04:37 |
Message-ID: | 71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A25683280105784B@loki.wc.globexplorer.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Informix fees vary but figure about $33,000 per CPU for a web environment (other licenses are cheaper, for instance, a server with only a handful of connections). On the plus side for Informix, the Oracle stuff we had consists of dozens of tapes and CDs ... Informix was rarely more a CD and much easier to get going.
Greg Williamson
DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony and Bryn Reina [mailto:reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com]
Sent: Fri 4/2/2004 6:28 AM
To: Bradley Kieser
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?
> Oracle's main drawbacks are:
> a) VERY resource-intensive with a high process startup overhead.
> b) VERY expensive. You are talking license fees into the £100 000s for
> big iron installations.
>
Wow! 100,000 pounds for software. Now that is expensive! Is that a ballpark
price for most of the commercial DB stuff out there? It would be interesting
to see just how expensive (cost of licensing-wise) commercial DBs really are
from a side-by-side matchup.
-Tony
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Naomi Walker | 2004-04-02 19:32:51 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
Previous Message | Goulet, Dick | 2004-04-02 18:43:33 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |