From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 |
Date: | 2018-09-15 18:17:24 |
Message-ID: | 71A15FC7-7824-4EF4-8D10-4CE19C70F73E@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On September 15, 2018 12:14:07 PM MDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Cool, sounds we have agreement. I'll try to come up with a patch.
>I'm [un]fortunately hiking till Wednesday, so I won't have an easy time
>to push a patch. I probably could push something tomorrow, but I'd
>have a hard time cleaning up if needed. Does anybody feel we should
>have that in Mondays release?
>
>Recent discussions among the release team are pointing to the idea
>that Monday's wrap could be 11rc1, not 11beta4, if we get this done
>beforehand. So I'd kind of like to see it done.
Yes, that's why I'm asking...
>Is there more that has to be done than switching the GUC's default
>value and adjusting docs? I could probably make it happen if there's
>not any hidden stuff to worry about.
No, that should be all. I'll adapt the llvm animals to force the GUC to on. I think it'd be good to add a paragraph to the release notes, mentioning that it has to be turned on.
Thanks!
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-15 18:19:55 | Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-15 18:14:07 | Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 |