From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Black <daniel(dot)black(at)au1(dot)ibm(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] docker instances of pgbuildfarm |
Date: | 2016-09-12 00:49:34 |
Message-ID: | 7190.1473641374@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members |
Daniel Black <daniel(dot)black(at)au1(dot)ibm(dot)com> writes:
> Relax, the git updates are done outside of the pgbuildfarm scripts.
> Below is the start of the log that triggered the build this morning.
The problem with inventing your own approach here is that your buildfarm
members' reports do not provide any evidence of what they are building
against. Please examine
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl
and note that your animals are not showing last-commit-id in their lines
on the summary page, and if you drill down to their build reports, those
don't show anything about "changes since last run" either, eg compare
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=demoiselle&dt=2016-09-12%2000%3A36%3A03
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=guaibasaurus&dt=2016-09-12%2000%3A17%3A01
That greatly reduces the usefulness of the reports.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-09-12 01:08:33 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] docker instances of pgbuildfarm |
Previous Message | Daniel Black | 2016-09-11 22:29:13 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] docker instances of pgbuildfarm |