Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO

From: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO
Date: 2011-10-14 17:41:11
Message-ID: 71849B01-DC48-480F-870F-443C853CF32B@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct14, 2011, at 19:27 , Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I meant verbosity, not error level. This quick test shows what I meant
>> -- but it doesn't work; the server log is altered as I expected (and does not
>> include the context lines), but not plpgsql's:
>
> Yeah, what we'd need is a client_error_verbosity setting.

We do transmit the individual parts of a NOTICE separately, so I'd say
suppressing some of them is the client's job. So, instead of a GUC I'd say
we'd need a psql setting ERROR_VERBOSITY.

best regards,
Florian Pflug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-10-14 17:51:29 Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-10-14 17:34:04 Re: Bugs in information_schema.referential_constraints view