Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs
Date: 2018-02-06 19:43:05
Message-ID: 71530296-e555-6bca-49d0-f3361aa883f4@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2/5/18 18:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I can see two ways to approach this: add two new subsections at the end
> of xindex.sgml, or create a new chapter about b-trees in Part VII
> ("Internals") to go beside the existing ones about the more recently added
> index types. The latter would make more sense if anyone was inspired to
> write something comparable in length to the existing per-index-type
> chapters. But I'm not volunteering to do that, so if it's a chapter it'd
> be a mighty thin one to start with.

xindex seems better to me.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-02-06 20:26:05 Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs
Previous Message Fabio Souza de Sá Teles 2018-02-06 12:48:17 trigger audit logon