From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning about ignored return value. |
Date: | 2008-11-20 20:08:24 |
Message-ID: | 7153.1227211704@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We're definitely *not* fortify-clean, although maybe trying to become so
>> would be a good idea. From memory, what I have seen in past builds on
>> Red Hat systems is a lot of warnings about ignoring the return value
>> from fwrite() and related functions.
> So. Should I revert it?
I dunno. Was that the only such warning you got on your build? That
would be a bit odd given that I see many more ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-11-20 20:45:30 | pgsql: Issue a proper error message when MD5 is attempted when |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-20 19:52:54 | pgsql: Fix breakage of bitmap scan plan creation for special index |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-20 20:16:54 | Re: pg_upgrade: How to deal with toast |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-20 20:05:35 | Re: Problem with Bitmap Heap Scan |