Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?
Date: 2005-04-12 05:24:54
Message-ID: 7151.1113283494@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is PostgreSQL supposed to enforce a LATIN1/ISO-8859-1 encoding if that's
> the database encoding?

AFAIK, there are no illegal characters in 8859-1, except \0 which we
do reject.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rémi Zara 2005-04-12 06:23:19 Re: NetBSD mac68k crashing on union regression test
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-12 05:23:27 Re: System vs non-system casts