RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement

Bingo, you got it in one.

There are only two businesses who call their customers 'users'

-----Original Message-----
From: Meskes, Michael [mailto:meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 1998 10:26 AM
To: 'Peter Mount'; 'Meskes, Michael'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement

Let me try. Hmm, something from Microsoft? :-)

Michael

--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes(at)debian(dot)org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 1998 10:44 AM
> To: 'Meskes, Michael'; 'Peter Mount'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
> Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
>
> [resent as the local mail system screwed up - 10 points to guess what
> system
> it is ;-) ]
>
> > Okay, I'm willing to add it to either libecpg or (preferable imn my
> > mind) to libpq. I'd also like to add my (old style) syntax if no one
> > objects.
>
> I don't see why not. Handling both won't expand libpq by that much.
>
> --
> Peter T Mount, peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
> Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please cc
> my
> home address.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 5:23 PM
> > To: 'Meskes, Michael'; 'Peter Mount'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
> > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
> > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
> >
> > I'm not sure about libpq as I've never used either with it. However,
> > URL-style does seem to be the in thing at the moment.
> >
> > --
> > Peter T Mount, peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
> > Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please
> cc
> > my
> > home address.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Meskes, Michael [mailto:meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 2:42 PM
> > To: 'Peter Mount'; 'Michael Meskes'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
> > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
> > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
> >
> >
> > Great. Do we implement this in libpq?
> >
> > And do we implement the old style syntax with '@', too?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
> > meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr.
> 20
> > meskes(at)debian(dot)org | 52146 Wuerselen
> > Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
> > Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 3:27 PM
> > > To: 'Michael Meskes'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
> > > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
> > > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
> > >
> > > > Is there any benefit to using a url-style spec?
> > > >
> > > > postgres://server:port/dbname
> > > >
> > > > Very fashionable :)
> > >
> > > This would be in line to JDBC's url-style:
> > >
> > > jdbc:postgresql://server:port/dbname?options
> > >
> > > --
> > > Peter T Mount, peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
> > > Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please
> > cc
> > > my
> > > home address.
> > >