RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement

From: Peter Mount <peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Meskes, Michael'" <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>, "'Peter Mount'" <peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, "'Thomas G(dot) Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: "'PostgreSQL Hacker'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
Date: 1998-05-08 08:43:48
Message-ID: 714F8949628ED1119E0F0060082C52F5095218@vesta.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[resent as the local mail system screwed up - 10 points to guess what system
it is ;-) ]

> Okay, I'm willing to add it to either libecpg or (preferable imn my
> mind) to libpq. I'd also like to add my (old style) syntax if no one
> objects.

I don't see why not. Handling both won't expand libpq by that much.

--
Peter T Mount, peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please cc my
home address.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 5:23 PM
> To: 'Meskes, Michael'; 'Peter Mount'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
> Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
>
> I'm not sure about libpq as I've never used either with it. However,
> URL-style does seem to be the in thing at the moment.
>
> --
> Peter T Mount, peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
> Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please cc
> my
> home address.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meskes, Michael [mailto:meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 2:42 PM
> To: 'Peter Mount'; 'Michael Meskes'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
> Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
>
>
> Great. Do we implement this in libpq?
>
> And do we implement the old style syntax with '@', too?
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
> meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
> meskes(at)debian(dot)org | 52146 Wuerselen
> Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
> Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 3:27 PM
> > To: 'Michael Meskes'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart'
> > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker'
> > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
> >
> > > Is there any benefit to using a url-style spec?
> > >
> > > postgres://server:port/dbname
> > >
> > > Very fashionable :)
> >
> > This would be in line to JDBC's url-style:
> >
> > jdbc:postgresql://server:port/dbname?options
> >
> > --
> > Peter T Mount, peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
> > Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please
> cc
> > my
> > home address.
> >

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Meskes, Michael 1998-05-08 09:06:32 RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1998-05-08 08:35:42 Re: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement