Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Date: 2001-11-26 00:55:30
Message-ID: 7139.1006736130@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> And I started the postmaster using:
> ./bin/postmaster -B 2000 -i $DEBUG --sort-mem=60

But

(a) did the sort_mem setting "take"?

(b) can you put more than one variable setting in there and have
them all take?

I tried

postmaster ... --enable_hashjoin=false --enable-mergejoin=false

and then verified

regression=# show enable_hashjoin;
NOTICE: enable_hashjoin is off
SHOW VARIABLE
regression=# show enable_mergejoin;
NOTICE: enable_mergejoin is off
SHOW VARIABLE

so it works okay on HPUX.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-26 01:04:27 Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-11-26 00:55:28 Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector