From: | "Timur V(dot) Irmatov" <itvthor(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re[2]: [GENERAL] Rйp |
Date: | 2002-10-08 11:00:12 |
Message-ID: | 7117282731.20021008160012@sdf.lonestar.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Martijn!
Tuesday, October 08, 2002, 3:45:13 PM, you wrote:
>> - No, PostgreSQL does NOT provide a way to restore a database up to the
>> last commited transaction, with a reapply of the WAL, as Oracle or SQL
>> Server ( and others, I guess) do. That would be a VERY good feature. See
>> Administrator's guide ch11
MvO> Umm, I thought the whole point of WAL was that if the database crashed, the
MvO> WAL would provide the info to replay to the last committed transaction.
MvO> http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?wal.html
MvO> ... because we know that in the event of a crash we will be able to recover
MvO> the database using the log: ...
MvO> These docs seem to corrobrate this.
>> So, with Pg, if you backup your db every night with pg_dump, and your
>> server crashes during the day, you will loose up to one day of work.
MvO> I've never lost any data with postgres, even if it's crashed, even without
MvO> WAL.
Suppose you made your nightly backup, and then after a day of work
the building where your server is located disappears in flames..
That's it - you lost one day of work (of course, if your dumps where
stored outside that building otherwise you lost everything)..
There is a need in "incremental" backup, which backs up only those
transactions which has been fulfilled after last "full dump" or last
"incremental dump". These backups should be done quite painlessly -
just copy some part of WAL, and should be small enough (compared to
full dump), so they can be done each hour or even more frequently..
I hope sometime PostgreSQL will support that. :-)
Sincerely Yours,
Timur
mailto:itvthor(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erwan DUROSELLE | 2002-10-08 12:17:47 | Re: Hot Backup |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2002-10-08 10:45:13 | Re: Rép |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-10-08 11:54:58 | Re: v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ... |
Previous Message | Sir Mordred The Traitor | 2002-10-08 10:57:46 | Re: Little note to php coders |