From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unused parameters & co in code |
Date: | 2019-01-30 14:41:04 |
Message-ID: | 7117.1548859264@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> ... while this generates a lot of noise for callbacks and depending on
> the environment used, this is also pointing to things which could be
> simplified:
I'd definitely take this on a case-by-case basis. In the planner
functions you mentioned, for instance, I'd be pretty hesitant to remove
the "root" parameter even if it happens not to be needed today.
We'd probably just end up putting it back in the future, because almost
everything in the planner needs that. I'd only consider removing it in
cases where there was a solid reason to require the function not to need
it ever (as for instance what I just did to flatten_join_alias_vars).
In cases where we can get simplifications of calling layers, and
it doesn't seem likely that we'd have to undo it in future, then
probably it's worth the trouble to change.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2019-01-30 14:41:46 | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-30 14:32:28 | Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay |