From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index name different from constraint name |
Date: | 2005-10-26 16:30:04 |
Message-ID: | 7116.1130344204@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Arguably we should forbid ALTER INDEX RENAME on an index that belongs to
>> a constraint, and make you rename the constraint instead (and have that
>> implicitly change the index name too).
> That would work too, though I don't think you can just rename a
> constraint.
Yeah, we'd need to add syntax for that, but it seems useful anyway.
Plan B would be to make the ALTER INDEX RENAME update the associated
constraint too, but that doesn't give you a facility to rename
constraints of other types.
Anyway, point is that I think we should force the index and constraint
names to track each other, rather than complicating matters by
supporting the situation where they are different.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2005-10-26 19:10:43 | Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-10-26 16:14:57 | Re: Index name different from constraint name |