From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
Date: | 2011-02-17 15:19:14 |
Message-ID: | 7107.1297955954@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2011/2/17 Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>:
>> We need to fix inet support as Tom complained and then will commit.
> I think those are two separate issues.
Yeah ... also, fixing the inet problem looked to me like it'd probably
be a major compatibility break (change in on-disk index contents).
Not something to rush into at the end of a development cycle.
In any case, I was pointing to that as a reason that btree_gist wasn't
ready to be in core. It has nothing to do with KNN-ifying the module.
I would like to see that happen before 9.1, else KNN will go out with
not very many actual use-cases supported.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-17 15:22:30 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-17 15:09:37 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix blatantly uninitialized variable in recent commit. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-17 21:43:12 | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-17 11:34:25 | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |