Re: Querying dependencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Querying dependencies
Date: 2023-05-22 18:11:53
Message-ID: 710259.1684779113@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Sometimes I'll "drop table .." on a replica just to see the list of
> dependencies,.. This is quite dumb. What's the simple query I can run to
> get the same detail without the idiocy?

Not sure about "simple", but here's an example of looking at the
catalog data for this:

regression=# create table mytable(a int primary key, b text unique);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table othertable (a int references mytable);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# select pg_describe_object(classid,objid,objsubid), deptype from pg_depend where refclassid = 'pg_class'::regclass and refobjid = 'mytable'::regclass;
pg_describe_object | deptype
--------------------------------------------------+---------
type mytable | i
toast table pg_toast.pg_toast_40635 | i
constraint mytable_pkey on table mytable | a
constraint othertable_a_fkey on table othertable | n
constraint mytable_b_key on table mytable | a
(5 rows)

See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-depend.html

In the general case you'd need to worry about indirect
dependencies, so you'd need to embed this in a recursive
CTE. But tables don't usually have indirect dependencies.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message André Rodrigues 2023-05-22 18:58:12 Logical Replication
Previous Message Wells Oliver 2023-05-22 18:01:12 Querying dependencies