Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Date: 2024-05-24 21:38:16
Message-ID: 710216.1716586696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I personally don't think the FOSDEM triage is a very productive use of
> our time - we go through patches top to bottom, often with little idea
> what the current state of the patch is. We always ran out of time after
> looking at maybe 1/10 of the list.

> Having an in-person discussion about patches would be good, but I think
> we should split the meeting into much smaller groups for that, each
> looking at a different subset. And maybe it should be determined in
> advance, so that people can look at those patches in advance ...

Yeah, subgroups of 3 or 4 people sounds about right. And definitely
some advance looking to see which patches need discussion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2024-05-24 22:00:21 Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP)
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-05-24 21:23:24 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose