From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
Date: | 2024-05-24 21:38:16 |
Message-ID: | 710216.1716586696@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I personally don't think the FOSDEM triage is a very productive use of
> our time - we go through patches top to bottom, often with little idea
> what the current state of the patch is. We always ran out of time after
> looking at maybe 1/10 of the list.
> Having an in-person discussion about patches would be good, but I think
> we should split the meeting into much smaller groups for that, each
> looking at a different subset. And maybe it should be determined in
> advance, so that people can look at those patches in advance ...
Yeah, subgroups of 3 or 4 people sounds about right. And definitely
some advance looking to see which patches need discussion.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-05-24 22:00:21 | Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP) |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-05-24 21:23:24 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |