From: | Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Connection pooler / LDAP auth / Load Balancing on read-only queries |
Date: | 2024-07-04 06:44:45 |
Message-ID: | 70f24716-e26d-1c2e-0516-ec079a659a3b@cloud.gatewaynet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 7/3/24 23:32, Holger Jakobs wrote:
> Am 03.07.24 um 22:25 schrieb Achilleas Mantzios:
>> Dear Members
>>
>> I am searching (like many others) of the holy grail of PostgreSQL
>> pooling + Load Balancing . Ideally I would like :
>>
>> - A pgbouncer with better/native LDAP (not PAM) / and eventually
>> Kerberos support
>>
>> - A pgbouncer enhanced with load balancing read-only queries (like
>> pgpool)
>>
>> or
>>
>> - A pgpool-II with better resources utilization / more efficient
>> pooling (like pgbouncer)
>>
>>
>> There are other solutions available pgcat (no LDAP), odyssey (no load
>> balancing) , pgagroal, supavisor, none of which seem to cover the above.
>>
>> Some ppl advice , keeping pgbouncer close to the app(s) and pgpool
>> close to the DB. But kinda had mixed feelings putting the two work
>> together.
>>
>> I'd like to ask if there any thoughts or even hopes that some of the
>> above will be available in a single software, or otherwise how do
>> people tackle this.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>
> Have a look at pgCat, a newcomer which might meet your needs.
Hello,
I already mentioned pgCat, and the reason it won't cut it. (no PAM, no
LDAP, only MD5/SCRAM-SHA-256)
>
> Cheers
>
> Holger
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sathish Reddy | 2024-07-04 09:52:26 | Toast table get list from instance |
Previous Message | Achilleas Mantzios - cloud | 2024-07-04 06:38:07 | Re: Connection pooler / LDAP auth / Load Balancing on read-only queries |