Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> Well, then the first order of business would be to write a benchmark kit. I
>>>> have been thinking for a while that we should make our own maintained
>>>> version of the DBT+* suite, or whatever other suite is appropriate. And
>>>> then start running it.
>>>
>>> Agreed. For a start on TPC-C, EnterpriseDB has a closer version of the kit.
>>
>> I don't recall turning away patches to make the dbt kits less TPC spec
>> compliant...
>
> Uhm, why would we send them to you? Are you the maintainer for DBT2 now? I
> looked recently and couldn't find any upstream source that had been touched
> any time within the last few years. Where do i find it?

Honestly I would have expected to see them sent to the osdldbt-general
mailing list, not to me personally. But I guess that was never
advertised in the kit. I don't think I stopped maintaining it, but
some people have been sending patches to the list that apply to
releases older than what is in the svn repository. That makes it a
little hard for me to get it right, especially when they are for
databases I don't use. And I admit fault at never announcing that
I've move the source code from svn to mercurial to git, which is not
on git.postgresql.org.

Regards,
Mark