| From: | "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | greg(at)tcscs(dot)com |
| Cc: | david(at)lang(dot)hm, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Gabrielle Roth" <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: file system and raid performance |
| Date: | 2008-08-05 15:00:02 |
| Message-ID: | 70c01d1d0808050800j7196922bt2c4b43ba09a19099@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood <greg(at)tcscs(dot)com> wrote:
> I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
> and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
> bonnie++, so the numbers are really only useful for my hardware.
>
> What parameters were used to create the XFS partition in these tests? And,
> what options were used to mount the file system? Was the kernel 32-bit or
> 64-bit? Given what I've seen with some of the XFS options (like lazy-count),
> I am wondering about the options used in these tests.
The default (no arguments specified) parameters were used to create
the XFS partitions. Mount options specified are described in the
table. This was a 64-bit OS.
Regards,
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Ike | 2008-08-05 16:51:44 | Re: file system and raid performance |
| Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2008-08-05 14:57:58 | Re: file system and raid performance |