| From: | katouknl <katouknl(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shinya Kato <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Suraj Khamkar <khamkarsuraj(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion |
| Date: | 2021-10-14 05:30:19 |
| Message-ID: | 70aeeddad2e087a7857eb7d4161e1879@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It is very good, but it seems to me that there are some tab-completion
> missing in COMMENT command.
> For example,
> - CONSTRAINT ... ON DOMAIN
> - OPERATOR CLASS
> - OPERATOR FAMILY
> - POLICY ... ON
> - [PROCEDURAL]
> - RULE ... ON
> - TRIGGER ... ON
>
> I think these tab-comletion also can be improved and it's a good
> timing for that.
Thank you for the comments!
I fixed where you pointed out.
Best wishes,
Ken Kato
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| comment_tab_complete.patch | text/x-diff | 7.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-10-14 05:40:04 | Re: Make query ID more portable |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-10-14 05:26:50 | Re: Accommodate startup process in a separate ProcState array slot instead of in MaxBackends slots. |