From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: (Comment)Bug in CteScanNext |
Date: | 2016-09-07 21:44:20 |
Message-ID: | 70a33d9c-9536-2c90-7ef9-b69ad0f213d5@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/6/16 12:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the other hand, if eof_cte is true, then what happened on the last
> call is that we tried to fetch forwards, reached EOF on the underlying
> query, and returned NULL. In that case, a backwards fetch *should*
> produce the last row in the tuplestore.
Patch attached.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
tuplestore.patch | text/plain | 2.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-07 21:58:42 | Re: GiST penalty functions [PoC] |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-07 21:42:26 | Re: Is tuplesort_heap_siftup() a misnomer? |